Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Send shadowsocks handshake with payload if available #1292

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2021

Conversation

nekohasekai
Copy link
Member

I am not sure if it makes sense

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 25, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #1292 (30dc49f) into master (c278db5) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1292   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   44.64%   44.65%           
=======================================
  Files         485      485           
  Lines       29524    29526    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        13182    13184    +2     
- Misses      14939    14940    +1     
+ Partials     1403     1402    -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
proxy/shadowsocks/client.go 1.00% <0.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
common/drain/drainer.go 65.51% <0.00%> (-6.90%) ⬇️
transport/pipe/impl.go 87.87% <0.00%> (-2.03%) ⬇️
transport/internet/kcp/connection.go 72.37% <0.00%> (+0.55%) ⬆️
app/router/command/command.go 57.77% <0.00%> (+4.44%) ⬆️
app/router/command/errors.generated.go 100.00% <0.00%> (+100.00%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c278db5...30dc49f. Read the comment docs.

@nekohasekai nekohasekai force-pushed the shadowsocks-handshake-with-playload branch from 543c799 to 30dc49f Compare September 25, 2021 13:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants